This is what a Strategic Exposure Scan produces.
Not a summary. Not a set of recommendations but a forensic examination of where a strategy holds and where it does not.
What follows is an anonymized excerpt. Seven diagnostic questions drawn from the full sixty-question scan, applied to a single strategic domain: AI-assisted pricing and eligibility decisions.
The patterns are not fictional.
The Strategic Exposure Scan is designed for use before supervisory engagement not during enforcement. Its purpose is to identify and address structural exposure while the organisation still controls the timing and the narrative.
Best before the next vendor renewal cycle, the next board strategy review, the next supervisory engagement
What this excerpt shows
This snapshot examines just one domain. The full Strategic Exposure Scan covers four:
-
Strategy. Market position, competitive assumptions, growth models.
-
Assumptions. Revenue dependencies, scaling logic, untested beliefs.
-
Governance. Accountability, controls, decision rights, audit readiness.
-
Dependency. Vendors, AI models, data sovereignty, exit capability, concentration risk.
Sixty-plus diagnostic questions (and our base is growing). Each scored against documentary evidence, external intelligence, and contradiction analysis. Each interpreted through four independent adversarial AI perspectives that challenge every assumption from a different angle.
The result is not a report. It is a board-ready decision package that shows exactly where the strategy holds under pressure and where it does not.
If this feels familiar
Every organisation we examine recognises something in this snapshot. Not because we have access to their data. Because the patterns are structural.
The same governance gaps. The same unexamined dependencies. The same distance between what the board believes and what could be demonstrated under scrutiny.
A Strategic Intake is a structured, one-day scoping session. The first layer of analysis, not a sales conversation.